Sunday, March 18, 2007

PJ- Haikus

Hai*ku (noun)- a form of Japanese poetry with 17 syllables in three unrhymed lines of five, seven, and five syllables, often describing nature or a season.

Here are some I've come up with:


Once upon a time,
there was an ugly midget.
A fat man ate him


Ms. Chiang teaches class.
She has great lesson ideas.
We blog and email.


In one's private heart
things go on that can not be
put down on paper


Because you are fat
Aliens will abduct you
to make themselves fat.


Haikus are silly.
It's hard to write seriously
with only 3 lines.


Seven, a number.
Above 6 and below 8.
Counting: 6,7,8.


I have to say this:
I really, really do want...
You know, nevermind.


After a quiet night,
during which no life did stir,
a vibrant morning.


Thirty years after,
people will still be mourning
for those lost today.


I am hoping that
years later, when I see these
I'll like what I did.


As the music plays
children are born and old folks
find a better place.
Romeo & Juliet Assignments


We've done a bunch of things for Romeo and Juliet. We spent weeks and weeks reading it, and watching the movies. There were several quizzes on different acts and scenes that we were supposed to read for homework. We would have written a letter from the perspective of Friar Lawrence, advising Romeo of the plan, but something odd happened and that was never assigned. We were also taught about rhyme scheme and we learned about monologues, soliloquies, similes, metaphors, paradoxes, and motifs.

I disliked reading as a class. To be blunt, the majority of the class couldn't make their part interesting to save their lives. There was no emotion or character at all. Then throw in the constant stumbles, stutters, and pauses, and out loud reading became unbearable. I'm not saying I was perfect, in fact I think I did a rather poor job reading, but I see that I was only one of many.

I enjoyed listening to the play a lot more. The characters in the tape already knew the part and would yell, cry, fight, make odd kissing (plunger) noises that made the play more interesting. In addition, the sound effects (swords, carts, horses, etc.) made it easier to envisage the busy market or crowded street.

Through the reading, we would have quizzes on what was covered in homework the night before. I disliked the quizzes, although that's probably just because I'm a student who had to take them. I did not enjoy working to show that I had read the material, however, they did help me reflect on what had happened. The only problem was when I read the scene, had no earthly idea of what was going on, and then took a quiz on it the next day.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Odyssey Test

1. What have you learned about Greek culture, values, and religion? Address the roles of women and men, honor and virtues, gods and goddesses, etc. (250 words)


After reading excerpts from "The Odyssey," I know a lot more about Greek culture, values, and religion. I now know many of the gods and goddesses the Greeks worshiped, such as Athena, Poseidon, and Zeus. The people believed that the gods helped them do everything in life, from sailing across the sea to driving the oxen through the fields. They were very big on making offerings to the god. If they did not sacrifice a ram, or other animal, when the gods helped them do something, the gods would turn their wrath towards them. The main plot of "The Odyssey" was that because Odysseus did not thank Poseidon, the sea god, for his help during the war, his voyage home was filled with hardships.
Around the time of The Odyssey, the Greeks obviously had many kingdoms in their country. Each had it's own king and queen, and lands. Odysseus was king of Ithaca, an island nation. Menelaus was also a king in the region. Others were mentioned. They all had lands, and citizens under them. A reason for so many kingdoms may be that most of these were island kingdoms, and could not easily be controlled from the mainland.

The Odyssey portrays people of the time as mostly strong warriors and workers. The wars described are all bloody and very long. It took 10 years for Odysseus to conquer Troy, and thousands of men were lost on both sides.

The fact that 20 years passed between Odysseus' leaving and returning emphasizes the extreme patience of the Greeks. There are few women in this day and age who would wait for a man 20 years, even though the man was believed dead.


2. What resonated with you in reading about Odysseus’ adventures? Why? (150 words)

Much of the language used in The Odyssey is very memorable. The violence included is also hard to forget. "But Odysseus aimed and shot Antinous square in the throat and the point went stabbing clean through the soft neck and out- and off to the side he pitched, the cup dropped from his grasp as the shaft sank home, and the man's life-blood came spurting from his nostrils- thick red jets-" resonates clearly with me (Homer). I will probably remember the point of that paragraph long after I have forgotten the name of Polyphemus, the Cyclops.

The amazing amount of detail in the book is flabbergasting. If most of the detail were cut out, The Odyssey would be less than half as long. The details, like the soft neck and thick red jets help the reader envisage the story, as if it was happening before their eyes.


3. This epic poem is dated nearly 3000 years ago, why is it still relevant? (150 words)

The Odyssey is a great work of literature, and is still taught 3000 years after its writing. It is one of the greatest examples of the common plot of almost every work of fiction. A hero goes on a quest to save someone or accomplish something, there is a female figure who he must return for, there are several confrontations, etc. Most stories follow these steps, along with some others. The Odyssey is no exception, Odysseus goes to conquer Troy, then must battle sea monsters and sirens to return home to see his wife. He ends up fighting all the suitors, and coming out victorious.

Along wit the fact that it is used to teach common plots, the fact that it is 3000 years old, and is still being taught, contributes to the fact that it is taught. If a work of literature could stay popular for 3000+ years, it must be good. Good enough to be read by the next generation, and the next. For these reasons, The Odyssey will most definitely be a part of the world of fiction for thousands of years more.

4. How would you characterize the narrator, the fictive "Homer" whose voice we imagine as singing the verses of the Odyssey?

When I think of Homer, I think of someone who was socially, no more than the beggar he portrayed Odysseus as in the end of The Odyssey. However, beneath the raggedy clothing and dirty face, was be a man with a great mind, not unlike Odysseus when undisguised. I think of Homer as an older man, between 50 and 70 in age, who had great memorization skills and, when his memory failed him, a great talent for improvising and making things up on the spot. I think he was a great talker, he could keep an audience captivated for hours at a time. He was also very spiritual and believed that all of what he told could possibly have happened.

5. What kinds of behavior are treated as contemptible in the Odyssey?

In the Odyssey, a person is expected to make offerings to the gods before or after a great event. If one did not do so, that person was usually punished by the gods for not showing the proper respect.

Also, men were not supposed to be cowards, and were expected to fight when challenged, or be considered a weak coward. Women were not supposed to challenge men or show disrespect, rather, the would do what was asked of them.


6. How does the poem represent mortal women? Since Penelope is the most important woman in the Odyssey, what qualities does she possess, and how does she respond to the troubles she faces? (Some of the other women are of note, too-Eurycleia the serving woman, the faithless maidservants, Nausicaa the Phaeacian princess, and Helen of Sparta, Menelaus' queen, whose elopement with Prince Paris sparked the Trojan War.)

In the Odyssey, the different mortal women were examples of several stereotypes. Penelope was a devoted wife who waited patiently for the man she loved, despite the temptations and obstacles put in her way. The faithless maidservants were women who broke the rules, and did not believe that any harm would come from it. Most of the women were beautiful and intelligent. They were women that any man would desire to marry.

7.How do Homer's gods think and behave? How do their actions and motivations differ from the conception of god in other religions of which you have knowledge? What role do the Homeric gods play in human affairs, and what is the responsibility of humans with respect to those gods?

The gods and goddesses in Homer's Odyssey are, to put it frankly, full of themselves. They show off their power and make it well known that they are superior to all other beings. They demand constant offerings from the mortals. If these ceremonies are not performed, the gods become angry and use their powers to keep the mistake from happening again. Poseidon punished Odysseus for ten years because he had angered him.

The gods in The Odyssey openly appear to people, and influence events with their powers. There is no debate over if the gods exist or not, as there is in almost every religion today. Simply, if you did not believe in the gods, you were punished by the gods, which usually served as a wake-up call, the message being, "We, gods, exist, you ignorant fool!"

Thursday, December 07, 2006

The Similarities Between Several Movies by Hayao Miyazaki

At different times throughout the semester, Ms. Chiang showed us movies by a man named Hayao Miyazaki. Mr. M's name takes such a long time to type that from this point forward he will be refered to as Mr. M. The movies we have watched included Spirited Away, My Neighbor, Totoro, and Princess Mononoke. They are all animated, anime-style movies directed by Mr. M.

I was no present at school at the time of the showing of My Neighbor, Totoro, so the movie descriptions below will only include Spirited Away, and Princess Mononoke.

These movies are strangely similar to each other in more ways than one. As Ms. Chiang noted in class, both of the ones I've seen have had large blobs in them. In one movie there were very large and roundish tears. In another there were many blobs of black ooze. All of these blobs looked similar to each other. I wonder if they are related. Then again, I'm not used to trying to determine the facial features of blobs of liquid.

The animals, in both movies, were very detailed. They were so detailed that you could see the warts and hairs on the pigs' snouts. Now that I think about it, pigs played a large part in both of the movies I saw. That could be another similarity. The music in both movies was also similar. I would not be surprised if the same composer wrote the music for both of them.

These movies had many similarities, some well disguised. When watching them back-to-back, it would be easy for one to recognize that they were made by the same man.

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Movie Review


As the title suggests, this is about two movies we watched in Ms. Chiang's class. If you are a person who's presentation will be discussed below, and you are weak of heart and would not like to hear things that could potentially be criticism (no guarantees), then I advise you to click here to skip this and read a very interesting story about four people who have an odd craving to kill one of their own.



Watching these movies effected me in more ways than one. Waking Life informed me about many different theories and ideas that have been formed over the years. I now know more of what people think of life, death, and everything in between. For example, there was one theory about a "mental pool" in which everyone in the world can access everyone else's thoughts, subconsciously of course. I have heard about this theory before and this movie explained it to me in greater detail.

I like how the director put everything together in the way he did, even though it made it hard to understand when watching it for the first time. The animation was a bit confusing, but it was an interesting style. It contributed to the idea of the entire movie being a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream .

Conversely, after watching Eternal Sunshine, I realized that I had not gotten much out of it. It was entertaining and had its funny moments, but that seemed to be all it could offer. However, the moral of the story is something worth examining. I think that the lesson is to "treasure what you have". I came to this conclusion because when the man was in the process of giving up his memories he changed his mind. However, his decision came too late to save his memories of the woman he loved.

Another moral could be "do not act impulsively". The woman said that she was probably being impulsive when she erased the man from her memory. The story could also have the moral of "if once you don't succeed, try, try again." Even though both the man and woman had forgotten everything about each other, they fell in love again. In the end of the movie they both found out about their previous relationship and how it had gone sour. Even with this knowledge they still decided to stay together and try again.

Both of these movies have been good entertainment for me. I am not exactly sure how they will tie into the rest of the presentation. If the movies had been introduced better and their significance to the Research Project explained, I am sure that I could have gotten more out of watching the movie. I hope to see a relationship between the movies and the rest of the presentations when presenting time actually comes.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006


11/13/06 Journal- An Execution




The following story contains slightly disturbing elements such as violence, blood and gore.

Reader Discretion Advised




Four people stood at the door of a hotel room. They smiled at each other, each one wondering if these would be the last smiles they would see in life. Four of them entered the room. Only 3 would come out alive. Each person had committed a horrible crime. Each hoped that they would not be the one executed.

Jack, the town's garbage man, was a genius. He was so smart that some said he would be the next Albert Einstein. It was only by a cruel trick of fate, which I will not go into now, that he became the driver of the town's garbage truck. One night, he was performing science experiments in his garage. That night's experiment consisted of mixing various chemicals to create nuclear fusion, which is a very interesting topic but, again, I will not go into it. Once he had finished his experiments he disposed of the chemicals in the trashcan. The next morning he dumped the trash into the garbage truck and began his morning rounds. As he drove along a rather bumpy street, through a very shady neighborhood, the jostling of the truck caused some of the discarded chemicals to react with each other. The garbage truck exploded, sending toxic chemicals all over the neighborhood. Almost everyone died. Jack had survived by staying in the driver's seat. When the truck exploded he was rocketed out of the danger zone by the force of the explosion.

Phillip lived in the neighborhood mentioned above. Phillip was also the town's butcher. When the garbage truck exploded, he cut his wife open with his butcher's knife and placed her corpse around his head. Somehow this protected him from the toxic chemicals until the radiation had returned to normal levels.

Alex was the person who rode on the back of the garbage truck. His job was to jump off when the truck stopped and take the garbage cans from the street corner. He had been searching the garbage for valuables, which had been accidentally discarded when the truck exploded in his face. Like Jack, he was rocketed to safety by the force of the blast. Unlike Jack, he was not unharmed. His arms were burned and he had odd boils on his face.

Gregory was a sanitation worker. He was fishing trash out of the sewers beneath the street when the truck exploded above his head. He was unaffected, but when almost everyone was dead, he looted their houses.

The group sat on the two hotel beds and after a short conversation they decided that one of them must die. They thought for a while. It was arguable whether Alex had really committed a crime. After arguing they voted. Once the vote was counted, Jack was selected to face death. The reasons behind this decision:
1. His carelessly discarded science experiments had been the cause of the deaths.
2. If the explosion had not occurred, nobody else's crimes would have been committed, or caught.
3. Jack should not have been messing around with nuclear fusion anyways.
4. Jack had a mole on his chin.

The four of them went into the bathroom and filled the bathtub with boiling water. They were about to put Jack in the water when Alex screamed. He coughed uncontrollably and began to puke into the tub. Someone got him a glass of water from the nearest water source, the bathtub. Alex drank the boiling water and screamed some more. His burnt skin broke open and blood ran out, turning the bathtub red. His boils swelled and exploded. Green puss went everywhere. Soon he fell into the tub and died.

Once these events had subsided the 3 remaining men looked at each other and began talking. Obviously, God had destroyed the most evil of them. Nobody tried to guess why the one who had committed no real crime was the one who died.

They decided that one of them was already dead so no good would come from killing another. They left the hotel and went over to Gregory's house for tea.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Journal-10/27/06
Disillusionment


Let's begin with a definition.
Disillusionment- a feeling of disappointment you feel when you find out something you thought was great is not really what you thought.

I think that some of the people I've met have not turned out as good a I thought. There were some people I met over the summer, at Duke T.I.P. I thought I could relate and compare to them, and that we could be great friends. However, by the end of three weeks I was sick of them and wanted to have nothing to do with them. They did some things that I didn't think a person like them would do. Once I got the know them, I saw how different we were. They turned out very different from the people I thought I would get to know.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Journal-10/18/06: Handicaps and privileges

I have many good qualities. However, my most obvious handicap is probably my shyness. I find that I have trouble talking to strangers and people who aren't my friends. When I speak in front of a group I mumble and talk quietly. I have to push myself to speak every word, otherwise I get a weird feeling and the words come out as something resembling mush. Once I talk to someone a lot and get to know them, talking to them gets easier. The more I tell someone, the easier it is to tell more. If I have to collaborate with a person I do not know very well for something like a project, it will take time before I start voicing my ideas and speaking my opinion. I think I'm getting better at it though.
However, sometimes this handicap acts as an advantage. I learn a lot about the world around me by listening and not talking. [Note to readers: I know more about you than you think. ;)]
Well, what I've learned so far:

10/24/06
1. Tachyons are hypothetical particles that naturally travel faster than the speed of light.


2. Light travels at a constant speed of about 186,282 miles per second and does not go any faster or slower, in any case.


3. While I walk across the room I have more mass that when I'm sitting still. (But only by a very small amount.)


10/25/06
4. Because mass increases as an object accelerates, the amount of energy required to continue to accelerate it increases too. This makes it impossible for any object with mass to reach the speed of light. Its mass would need to be infinite, but that would require infinite energy.


5. Light travels at the speed of light because photons (the quantum particle of light) have no mass. For an equation: M=m?? where M is the total mass of the object while it is at the speed of light (c), m? is its mass when it's not moving, and ? is infinity. If the object has no mass (like light) M=0?, therefore M=0.

10/26/06
6. Gravity moves at the speed of light.

7. Einstein's famous theory, E=mc² says that an object's energy, E, is equal to mc². (Its mass multiplied by the speed of light squared.) This implies that an object's mass and its energy are directly proportional.
My research topic is Exceeding The Speed of Light.
Thesis:
Although the speed of light is supposed to be a constant, some scientists hypothesize that the universal speed limit can be changed and passed.

Monday, October 16, 2006

10/16/06 Journal A-Z Autobiography


In 2006, I wrote this A-Z autobiography.
I have never broken a bone.
I have four cats and three dogs.
I am a friend with almost everyone.
I went to Fernbank Elementary School, then Westchester Elementary.
I got a big computer for my 14th birthday.
I have a good time at school everyday.
Once, in my childhood, I was cut on the cheek by scissors.
While in English class I write journals.
I know a lot of things about math and science.
I love my family.
I might fight with my brother when I get home, but I hope not.
I have no allergies.
I have more than one sibling.
I like to put things together.
I never quit once I've started something.
I walk, not run, to school on some days.
Sometimes, I don't study for tests.
Today was a normal day.
I don't keep anything under my bed.
Everyone tells me that I'm very smart.
I went to Kansas last summer.
My friend plays the xylophone.
Last year I went to Mexico.
I have been to the zoo and seen all types of animals.

Monday, October 02, 2006

At 12:49 on 10/2/2006 I created this blog for English Class. Yay!

Journal-10/2/06
What happens when I die? Where does the soul go? What will happen to my body?

When I die, I want my body to be donated to science. I don't think I will be needing it once I am dead. I don't want it to sit underground, rotting in a wooden box. Cremation wouldn't be a bad thing, but my body should be used to help others learn things. If my body is donated to science, I could lead to a great scientific discovery, and I'd be remembered as the dead guy who helped cure cancer (or something).
I believe that when someone dies they just stop existing. They don't feel or experience anything. It is like when you fall into a deep, dreamless sleep but you never wake up. All of eternity passes in the moment you close your eyes for the final time, but you see nothing and experience nothing. An infinite number of these forevers go by in a split second, but there is no way to tell time and no reason to care. You are dead and nothing matters anymore. There is no waking up from the dark sleep of death, no Heaven or Hell to spend your afterlife in bliss or torture. There is no reincarnation as another being. This life is all you get, so make good use of it.
I don't know if I believe in the soul of a person. I don't know if it would make a difference if it existed or not. I'm not sure if the people around me are real, and have real souls or if they are just figments of my imagination. Maybe they are just people who exist to make life more interesting. Or maybe each and every one of them has a soul and wonders these exact questions about me. I can't say I know what happens to the soul (if it even exists) and I don't think anyone knows. It might just disappear, which could fit with my idea of death. I think that you are your brain, controlling the body and thinking. This belief leaves little room for a soul to be. I am still unsure of its existence, but I doubt it will matter. Different people think different things about this topic and they are all entitled to their own beliefs; but I am going to live my life and worry about what happens next when I get there.